Is Ms. Serious?

I just watched a movie on HBO starring Nicole Kidman called The Invasion (trailer), in which the people of the earth are exposed to an extra-terrestial virus/spore that causes them, once they’ve been exposed and then fallen asleep, to wake up as pod people.  The movie bears an uncanny resemblance to the past election cycle and the country’s current zeitgeist. 

Though there are some glimmers that some are starting to recover, for the most part, the MSM Obama-mania  continues unabated.   Check out the cover of Ms. magazine’s “Special Inaugural  Edition.”

msmagazinesobama1

No, really! It’s not The Onion.

Pardon me while I go throw up.

egalia at Tennessee Guerilla Women is boggled, as am I:

 . . .the easy to please feminists over at Ms. Magazine put Barack Obama on the cover and gush like teeny-boppers that Obama is some Feminist Super Man who will, presumably, save us little wimin.

I must have been asleep when the self-identified feminist and Wonder Woman presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton and her claws made the cover of Ms.

. . . there are many many many problems (Jon Favreau, Larry Summers, Rick Warren, etc.) with a liberal feminist magazine proclaiming Barack Obama to be a feminist, starting with the fact that he is Not even a liberal, and he has never publicly identified himself as a feminist. (Michelle has rejected the term.) And then there is the undeniable fact that a feminist president would have far more than a pitiful 5 women in his/her cabinet.

TGW includes a great round-up of reaction around the blogosphere.

Anna Belle always has an unique perspective. She focuses on the Superman imagery:

But let’s explore the image further, shall we? What does this image suggest to the women viewing it? Doesn’t it suggest that we should relax, because he may be a closet feminist, but he’s also a Superfeminist? As soon as women are in crisis, you can trust that Obama will emerge your hero? I submit that it also suggests that feminism–and women by extension–need saving, and Obama’s just the man to do it. This is the same line of rhetoric that the Obama camp has been feeding various constituencies for well on 2 years now: Trust me, this is all just talk, just business; I’m actually one of YOU. Finally, the image imparts a kind of perfection in its hagiographic representation of Obama as a man who only wants to do good, and who could not possibly have ulterior motives.

[...]

The idea of Barack Obama as Superfeminist is absurd and offensive, but it is also a trick. We’ve seen this kind of rehabilitation before. We saw it with Summers and Favreau, when articles that showed them a favorable light, especially articles by women began to emerge from various media outlets. This is also the same technique we’ve seen the Bush Administration use for eight long years now. Whenever a problem comes up, run it through your personal propaganda mill, the press, and change the narrative. Don’t let them do that.

No further comment.

9 responses to this post.

  1. http://thenewagenda.net/2009/01/11/vote-in-nows-media-hall-of-shame/

    I just voted for Ms. Magazine. Very easy vote form.

  2. Done. Here is what I wrote:

    I would like to nominate the Ms. magazine “Special Inaugural Edition.” I find the cover preposterous and a slap in the face to all the women (and men) who truly are feminists and work, openly and gladly, for the betterment of women.

    Link: https://store.msmagazine.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=179

    If Obama had stood next to Hillary Clinton and Patty Murray to denounce the new HHS “conscience clause” regulations, I might have thought, “Maybe he really is a feminist at heart.” Instead, Ms. magazine has declared to be a “Super-feminist” the man who has invited misogynist Rick Warren to give the benediction at the inaugural, has put PRO-LIFE Tim Kaine at the helm of the DNC, who has said that a woman’s right to choose should be in consult with her “husband and pastor,” that mental illness should not be a legitimate reason for a woman to seek an abortion, and whose chief speech writer posted a picture of himself groping the breast of a sitting senator and future Secretary of State and who is writing Obama’s speech instead of standing in the unemployment line.

    Further, this cover seems to infer that we women need our own version of Clark Kent aka Superman, and that underneath that “guy” exterior beats the heart of a dyed-in-the-wool feminist. I’ve seen no evidence in favor of that verdict.

  3. On a side note: How many times is Hollywood going to make the same movie? (1956, 1978 Invasion of the Body Snatchers)

  4. What was really sick with this version is that they used news footage of the Columbia disaster (they called it “Patriot”) and then added that some sort of “spore” that could withstand the sub-freezing temperatures of space and the intense heat of re-entry had attached itself to the shuttle and this tainted debris was spread over a 200 mile area. My first thought was, “Didn’t this “spore” attach itself to any other shuttle? Why just now?”

    I’ll willingly suspend my disbelief, but not if they are going to insist on using IRL footage we all KNOW.

  5. Posted by TLE on January 12, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    I remember, about a year ago, before our Michigan primary-that-didn’t-count, going to both the Clinton and Obama websites to see for myself what the had to say about issues. The very first thing I noticed on the Obama site was the “Faith” issues section, the first line of which said something about having God in our lives every day. Clinton’s site did not have a section on religion. Her site did, however, have a section about women’s issues, which had a great deal of content. Obama’s site had no mention whatsoever of women’s issues. I decided that day who I was going to support, and never looked back.

    Feminist, my eye. Ms. Magazine: Seventeen for the thirty-somethings. Sad.

  6. TLE, I discovered the same thing. I also noticed that no where on Barack Obama’s web site did you see any mention that he was actually a Democrat.

    I’m pretty sure I wrote about that sometime ago, but it might take a little while for me to find the post.

  7. Posted by ea on January 15, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    I wonder if they even know how much they should be embarassed. I stopped reading Ms. a long time ago, but can’t remember the reason. Apparently, it is now kitty box liner.

  8. [...] Posted on January 15, 2009 by bluelyon In my previous post, Is Ms. Serious?   , TLE comments: I remember, about a year ago, before our Michigan primary-that-didn’t-count, [...]

  9. Yeah, I did too. I can’t remember why either. Obviously, they stopped speaking to my life a long time ago.

Comments are closed.